Into Thin Air Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Into Thin Air - render ExampleFrom this standpoint, mounting Everest as conquered by him belongs to him exclusively, and each(prenominal) measure of the conquest is his special property. I spread full marks to him for his creditability as a newsman, writer and a journalist. He is all these three molded into one. For producing such a book he has done lots of research, which is the hallmark of a good reporter and journalist, and he writes well and evokes intense curiosity with the reader about his adventurous journey. Those who know about Mount Everest expeditions also know that descent is more difficult than the ascent. On May 10, 1996 Krakauer was on the conduct of the humanness having reached the summit at 29,028 ft. He was the conqueror. He could not celebrate his pride and satisfaction for long he was not at the cricket ground at Lords or in the Disneyland. He was on the brash summit, where each moments delay in the ascent invited perils. The well-studied Krakauer was full y aw are of the situation. Reaching the top is a great emotional experience. For Krakauer, it was the realization of a childhood dream. Each step or each breath at such a height is life history or death situation, which has zero security deposit for mistakes. If you are the leader and the decision-making authority of the expedition, you owe responsibility to the lives of the members involved in the adventure, apart from your get rare life. As Krakauer began the descent, a severe storm was forming and he had not slept for the last fifty-two hours. He matte up so weak he rested after each step to recoup the energy. He had befuddled the turnaround time for the descent, as the ambition to conquer the summit was too strong with him and with other members of the expedition. This is a good adventure book and a true story. The heads of the expeditions, the trials and tribulations welcome been given in detail and are helpful for a research student, as well for an aspiring mountaineer. The detailed background reading is immensely useful, as it introduces the characters of the expedition, like the importance of the experienced guides to the inexperienced but ambitious climbers. Mountaineering expeditions have strange combinations. Certainly Krakauers expedition was one of them. Summit of Mount Everest is a terrible attraction. So far so good, if all goes well. But when tragedies strike expeditions and valuable lives are lost, the decision makers are questioned. hard doubts arise in the minds of the family members why the dying man was not saved. The leader of the team is grilled and asked inconvenient questions. In all fairness, no leader would want any member of his team be bury in the snow. As stated above, when more than one individual write their experiences and books are published, there are bound to be differences of opinions and controversies. Anatoli Boukreevs version of the expedition, especially relating to saving members of the expedition, varies wit h that of Krakauer. Krakauaer may be less insolent and might not have exhibited the same courage in taking the risk to save the life of fellow-mountaineers. But no one can pass summary judgment that Krakauer did not live up to the situation. Remember, each step at that perilous weather at such a height, is a step between life and death. He has his own limitations as a mountaineer and has to take into account his own